SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Arable

Other Farm management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Arable does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Arable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arable has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Arable does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Arable does notArable publishes, and they do not
Farmbritefarmbrite.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Lelylely.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
GEA Farmgea.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Agworldagworld.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Datamarsdatamars.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Davis Instrumentsdavisinstruments.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Climate Fieldviewclimate.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Landdatalanddata.de 14/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
365Farmnet365farmnet.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Nextfarmingnextfarming.de 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Ag Leaderagleader.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Agridentagrident.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.