SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Fitli

Other Fitness and studio management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fitli does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Fitli on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fitli has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fitli does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Fitli does notFitli publishes, and they do not
deskbirddeskbird.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Optixoptixapp.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Momencemomence.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Andcardsandcards.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Wodifywodify.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Everfiteverfit.io 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Mindbodymindbodyonline.com 27/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
My PT Hubmypthub.net 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Yardi Kubeyardikube.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Glofoxglofox.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Clubworxclubworx.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Cobotcobot.me 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.