SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to FoodChain ID

Other Food safety and traceability vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FoodChain ID does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from FoodChain ID on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FoodChain ID has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FoodChain ID does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FoodChain ID does notFoodChain ID publishes, and they do not
Checkitcheckit.net 39/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Controlantcontrolant.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
MonitorQAmonitorqa.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Trustwelltrustwell.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
SafetyChainsafetychain.com 23/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
FoodDocsfooddocs.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Intertek Alchemyalchemysystems.com 30/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
Ecolab Digitalecolab.com 23/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Datatracemesalabs.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Normexnormex.ca 13/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
AIB Internationalaibinternational.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Emerson Cargoemerson.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.