Transparency alternatives to MonitorQA
Other Food safety and traceability vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at MonitorQA. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from MonitorQA on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
MonitorQA has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at MonitorQA” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at MonitorQA | Found at MonitorQA, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlantcontrolant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Controlant | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Checkitcheckit.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Checkit | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Trustwelltrustwell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustwell | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Intertek Alchemyalchemysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intertek Alchemy | 30/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Squizifysquizify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squizify | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SafetyChainsafetychain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SafetyChain | 23/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Tivetive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tive | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Halo Foodhalofood.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Halo Food | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Certdoxcertdox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Certdox | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Ecolab Digitalecolab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecolab Digital | 23/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SoftSpecsoftspec.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftSpec | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FoodDocsfooddocs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodDocs | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.