SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Intertek Alchemy

Other Food safety and traceability vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Intertek Alchemy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 35 that differ from Intertek Alchemy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Intertek Alchemy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Intertek Alchemy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Intertek AlchemyFound at Intertek Alchemy, not found there
Controlantcontrolant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Controlant 39/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Checkitcheckit.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Checkit 39/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data processing agreement Compare
MonitorQAmonitorqa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MonitorQA 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Trustwelltrustwell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustwell 35/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Squizifysquizify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squizify 26/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
SafetyChainsafetychain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SafetyChain 23/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Tivetive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tive 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
FoodDocsfooddocs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodDocs 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Normexnormex.caSee also Transparency alternatives to Normex 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ecolab Digitalecolab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecolab Digital 23/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
SoftSpecsoftspec.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftSpec 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Datatracemesalabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrace 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.