Transparency alternatives to Brandworkz
Other Franchise management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Brandworkz. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Brandworkz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Brandworkz has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Brandworkz” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Brandworkz | Found at Brandworkz, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crunchtimecrunchtime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crunchtime | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rallywarerallyware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rallyware | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Syncforcesyncforce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Syncforce | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Wooqerwooqer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wooqer | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Gostockedgostocked.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gostocked | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Marqmarq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Marq | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| StoreForcestoreforce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StoreForce | 26/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| VipeCloudvipecloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VipeCloud | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Frandatafrandata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frandata | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Opsanaliticaopsanalitica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Opsanalitica | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cerosceros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ceros | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Chainformationchainformation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chainformation | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.