SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Jumio

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Jumio does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Jumio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Jumio has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Jumio does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Jumio does notJumio publishes, and they do not
Feedzaifeedzai.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Veriffveriff.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Socuresocure.com 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Alloyalloy.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
IDnowidnow.io 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Signifydsignifyd.com 35/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Shufti Proshuftipro.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Ondatoondato.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
ComplyAdvantagecomplyadvantage.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Truliootrulioo.com 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ravelinravelin.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.