SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Sift

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sift does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Sift on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sift has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Sift does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sift does notSift publishes, and they do not
Feedzaifeedzai.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Veriffveriff.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Sardinesardine.ai 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Socuresocure.com 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Alloyalloy.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
IDnowidnow.io 39/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Sumsubsumsub.com 39/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Shufti Proshuftipro.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
iDenfyidenfy.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Ondatoondato.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Signifydsignifyd.com 35/100 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.