SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Arcesium

Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Arcesium does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Arcesium on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arcesium has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Arcesium does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Arcesium does notArcesium publishes, and they do not
Affinityaffinity.co 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Intappintapp.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Chronographchronograph.pe 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Juniper Squarejunipersquare.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Runditrundit.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fundwavefundwave.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Anduinanduintransact.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Passthroughpassthrough.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Allvueallvuesystems.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
4Degrees4degrees.ai 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Bipsyncbipsync.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Eddaedda.co 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.