SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SS&C Technologies

Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SS&C Technologies does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from SS&C Technologies on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SS&C Technologies has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SS&C Technologies does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SS&C Technologies does notSS&C Technologies publishes, and they do not
Affinityaffinity.co 70/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Intappintapp.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Visiblevisible.vc 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Fundwavefundwave.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Juniper Squarejunipersquare.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Runditrundit.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Anduinanduintransact.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Passthroughpassthrough.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Chronographchronograph.pe 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Vestlanevestlane.com 22/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Allvueallvuesystems.com 17/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.