SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Everdays

Other Funeral home software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Everdays does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Everdays on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Everdays has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Everdays does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Everdays does notEverdays publishes, and they do not
Wellthywellthy.com 43/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Aeternitasaeternitas.de 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Passarepassare.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Willowwillow.co 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Empathyempathy.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Osirisosirissoftware.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bestattungsvergleichbestattungsvergleich.de 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kartdatakartdata.co.uk 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Chroniclechronicle.rip 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Mymoriamymoria.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Aftercareaftercare.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Asdmyasd.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.