SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Esri

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Esri does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Esri on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Esri has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Esri does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Esri does notEsri publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Alteryx Spatialalteryx.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ascent Cloudascentcloud.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nearmapnearmap.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Geoapifygeoapify.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Mapmemapme.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Maptilermaptiler.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.