SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PixElement Cloud

Other GIS and mapping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PixElement Cloud does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from PixElement Cloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PixElement Cloud has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PixElement Cloud does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PixElement Cloud does notPixElement Cloud publishes, and they do not
Mapboxmapbox.com 61/100 8 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +5 nothing Compare
GIS Cloudgiscloud.com 55/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Safe Software FMEsafe.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Bentley Systemsbentley.com 43/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 nothing Compare
Planetplanet.com 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Pointlypointly.ai 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
LightBoxlightboxre.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 nothing Compare
MetaLocatormetalocator.com 38/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
UP42up42.com 38/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
CARTOcarto.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
eSpatialespatial.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Skyfiskyfi.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.