Transparency alternatives to AquaResource
Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that AquaResource does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 63 that differ from AquaResource on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
AquaResource has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and AquaResource does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and AquaResource does not | AquaResource publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submittablesubmittable.com | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fluxxfluxx.io | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Foundantfoundant.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rekorrekor.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Accelaaccela.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ProudCityproudcity.com | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Axonaxon.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Polcopolco.us | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ARMSarms.com | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Granicusgranicus.com | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mark43mark43.com | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Harris Correctionsharriscorrections.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.