SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to PayIt

Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PayIt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from PayIt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PayIt has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PayIt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PayIt does notPayIt publishes, and they do not
OpenGovopengov.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Fluxxfluxx.io 43/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Foundantfoundant.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Granicusgranicus.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Accelaaccela.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Mark43mark43.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Rekorrekor.ai 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cataliscatalisgov.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kahuakahua.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Axonaxon.com 26/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Tyler Technologiestylertech.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
ClearGovcleargov.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.