Alternatives to Rentals United
Other Hotel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Rentals United does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Rentals United on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rentals United has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Rentals United does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Rentals United does not | Rentals United publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyondbeyondpricing.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Roomprice Genieroompricegenie.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Clock PMSclock-software.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lodgifylodgify.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sirvoysirvoy.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Guestyguesty.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Uplistinguplisting.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Duettoduettocloud.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Streamlinestreamlinevrs.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fideliofidelio.at | 24/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Escapiaescapia.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Ownerrezownerrez.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.