Transparency alternatives to Rentals United
Other Hotel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rentals United. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 56 that differ from Rentals United on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rentals United has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Rentals United” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rentals United | Found at Rentals United, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyondbeyondpricing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beyond | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Roomprice Genieroompricegenie.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Roomprice Genie | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SuiteOpsuiteop.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuiteOp | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sirvoysirvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sirvoy | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Guestyguesty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guesty | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Clock PMSclock-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clock PMS | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lodgifylodgify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lodgify | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Aptechaptech-inc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aptech | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Glowingglowing.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Glowing | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fideliofidelio.atSee also Transparency alternatives to Fidelio | 24/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Escapiaescapia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Escapia | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Ownerrezownerrez.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ownerrez | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.