Transparency alternatives to Escapia
Other Hotel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Escapia. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from Escapia on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Escapia has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Escapia” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Escapia | Found at Escapia, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuiteOpsuiteop.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuiteOp | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Beyondbeyondpricing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beyond | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Roomprice Genieroompricegenie.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Roomprice Genie | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Lodgifylodgify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lodgify | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Sirvoysirvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sirvoy | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Rentals Unitedrentalsunited.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rentals United | 27/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Guestyguesty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guesty | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Ownerrezownerrez.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ownerrez | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Smoobusmoobu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smoobu | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| VRBookingsvrbookings.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VRBookings | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Hotelogixhotelogix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hotelogix | 17/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Clock PMSclock-software.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clock PMS | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.