SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Astrix

Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Astrix does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Astrix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Astrix has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Astrix does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Astrix does notAstrix publishes, and they do not
Oasis Securityoasis.security 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Hyprhypr.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Access Owlaccessowl.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Imprivataimprivata.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Avatieravatier.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
GAT Labsgatlabs.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Simeiosimeio.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Beta Systemsbetasystems.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Clear Skyeclearskye.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ipgipg-group.com 23/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Entitleentitle.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Evidian Orbionevidian.com 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.