Transparency alternatives to Evidian Orbion
Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Evidian Orbion does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Evidian Orbion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Evidian Orbion has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Evidian Orbion does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Evidian Orbion does not | Evidian Orbion publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyprhypr.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oasis Securityoasis.security | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Imprivataimprivata.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Access Owlaccessowl.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Avatieravatier.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GAT Labsgatlabs.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Simeiosimeio.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Entitleentitle.io | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stratastrata.io | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Beta Systemsbetasystems.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Clear Skyeclearskye.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Radiantlogicradiantlogic.com | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.