SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Tools4ever

Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tools4ever does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Tools4ever on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tools4ever has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tools4ever does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tools4ever does notTools4ever publishes, and they do not
Hyprhypr.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Imprivataimprivata.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Access Owlaccessowl.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Entitleentitle.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Identityautomationidentityautomation.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Beta Systemsbetasystems.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Clear Skyeclearskye.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ipgipg-group.com 23/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Stratastrata.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Evolveumevolveum.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Optimal Idmoptimalidm.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sonraisonraisecurity.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.