Alternatives to Kintaba
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kintaba does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Kintaba on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kintaba has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kintaba does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Kintaba does not | Kintaba publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.io | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.app | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| FireHydrantfirehydrant.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PagerDutypagerduty.com | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PagerTreepagertree.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| xMattersxmatters.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.