SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Softfair

Other Insurance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Softfair does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Softfair on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Softfair has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Softfair does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Softfair does notSoftfair publishes, and they do not
Ezlynxezlynx.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Ivansivans.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Duck Creekduckcreek.com 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Guidewireguidewire.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Zegurozeguro.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Root Platformrootplatform.com 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Clearspeedclearspeed.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Crawfordcrawco.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Five Sigmafivesigmalabs.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Clarkclark.de 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Eberleberls.com 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
EIS Groupeisgroup.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.