Transparency alternatives to Katana
Other Inventory management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Katana. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Katana on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Katana has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Katana” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Katana | Found at Katana, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordoroordoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ordoro | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Brahmin Solutionsbrahmin-solutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brahmin Solutions | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| EazyStockeazystock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EazyStock | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| ShipHeroshiphero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipHero | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| SOS Inventorysosinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SOS Inventory | 37/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Sortlysortly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sortly | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Asset.Guruasset.guruSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset.Guru | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Cin7cin7.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cin7 | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Inventory Procissltd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inventory Pro | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Pickwarepickware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pickware | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Linnworkslinnworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Linnworks | 30/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| ShipBobshipbob.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipBob | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.