Transparency alternatives to Brahmin Solutions
Other Inventory management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Brahmin Solutions. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Brahmin Solutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Brahmin Solutions has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Brahmin Solutions” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Brahmin Solutions | Found at Brahmin Solutions, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOS Inventorysosinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SOS Inventory | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ShipHeroshiphero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipHero | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ShipBobshipbob.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipBob | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Ordoroordoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ordoro | 61/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cin7cin7.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cin7 | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fishbowlfishbowlinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fishbowl | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| inFlowinflowinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to inFlow | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Brightpearlbrightpearl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brightpearl | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Linnworkslinnworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Linnworks | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Katanakatanamrp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Katana | 29/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Billbeebillbee.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Billbee | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Order Time Inventoryordertime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Order Time Inventory | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.