SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Anaqua

Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Anaqua does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Anaqua on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Anaqua has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Anaqua does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Anaqua does notAnaqua publishes, and they do not
PatSnappatsnap.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
IPRallyiprally.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Wellspringwellspring.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Amplifiedamplified.ai 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Corsearchcorsearch.com 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
EBRANDebrand.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Questelquestel.com 22/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Red Pointsredpoints.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Doppeldoppel.com 27/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Inteuminteum.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
IPzenipzen.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Nameshieldnameshield.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.