Transparency alternatives to Claromentis
Other Knowledge base and wiki vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Claromentis. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Claromentis on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Claromentis has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Claromentis” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Claromentis | Found at Claromentis, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waybookwaybook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Waybook | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scribescribehow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scribe | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codacoda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Coda | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Nuclinonuclino.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nuclino | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kipwisekipwise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kipwise | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Docmostdocmost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docmost | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Slabslab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slab | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gurugetguru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guru | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Trainualtrainual.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trainual | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Anytypeanytype.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Anytype | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Helpjuicehelpjuice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Helpjuice | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Obsidianobsidian.mdSee also Transparency alternatives to Obsidian | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.