SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to KnowledgeOwl

Other Knowledge base and wiki vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that KnowledgeOwl does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from KnowledgeOwl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

KnowledgeOwl has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and KnowledgeOwl does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and KnowledgeOwl does notKnowledgeOwl publishes, and they do not
Codacoda.io 39/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Docmostdocmost.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Slabslab.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Gurugetguru.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Obsidianobsidian.md 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Tettratettra.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Waybookwaybook.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Anytypeanytype.io 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Helpjuicehelpjuice.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Papyrspapyrs.com 23/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
BookStackbookstackapp.com 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Fiberyfibery.io 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.