Transparency alternatives to Anthill
Other Label and artwork management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Anthill. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from Anthill on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Anthill has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Anthill” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Anthill | Found at Anthill, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aprooveaproove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aproove | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| IntelligenceBankintelligencebank.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IntelligenceBank | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GlobalVisionglobalvision.coSee also Transparency alternatives to GlobalVision | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ManageArtworksmanageartworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ManageArtworks | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lytholytho.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytho | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| InformaIT Content Compareinformait.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InformaIT Content Compare | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Artwork Flowartworkflowhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Flow | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| NutriLabnutrilab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NutriLab | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Chili Publishchili-publish.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chili Publish | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Managed Artworkmanagedartwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Managed Artwork | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Foodwarefoodware365.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foodware | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Loftwareloftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loftware | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.