SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to LAAMP

Other Learning management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that LAAMP does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 41 that differ from LAAMP on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LAAMP has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and LAAMP does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and LAAMP does notLAAMP publishes, and they do not
Skilljarskilljar.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Anthologyanthology.com 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, +3 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Codiocodio.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Teachableteachable.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
TalentLMStalentlms.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
LearnWorldslearnworlds.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
D2Ld2l.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Articulatearticulate.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
eloomieloomi.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Instructureinstructure.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Edmingleedmingle.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Arloarlo.co 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.