SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Alexandria

Other Library systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Alexandria does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Alexandria on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Alexandria has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Alexandria does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Alexandria does notAlexandria publishes, and they do not
Clarivateclarivate.com 39/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
OverDriveoverdrive.com 39/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
EBSCOebsco.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Atriuumbooksys.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Ex Librisexlibrisgroup.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Bibliothecabibliotheca.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Liberoliberolms.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Allegroallegro-c.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Biblionixbiblionix.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Cloud Libraryyourcloudlibrary.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Divibibdivibib.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Follett Destinyfollettlearning.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.