SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Giskard

Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Giskard does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Giskard on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Giskard has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Giskard does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Giskard does notGiskard publishes, and they do not
Langfuselangfuse.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Confident AIconfident-ai.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Openlayeropenlayer.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Fiddlerfiddler.ai 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Arizearize.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Braintrustbraintrust.dev 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
HiddenLayerhiddenlayer.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Lunarylunary.ai 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Lakeralakera.ai 35/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Patronus AIpatronus.ai 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Agentaagenta.ai 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Galileogalileo.ai 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.