Transparency alternatives to RUAL Core
Other Low-code and internal tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RUAL Core does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from RUAL Core on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
RUAL Core has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and RUAL Core does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and RUAL Core does not | RUAL Core publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retoolretool.com | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Caspiocaspio.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pegapega.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Forest Adminforestadmin.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mendixmendix.com | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Superblockssuperblocks.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Betty Blocksbettyblocks.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Budibasebudibase.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| UI Bakeryuibakery.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Agilebaseagilebase.co.uk | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Kohezionkohezion.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cognisscogniss.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.