Transparency alternatives to Junip
Other Loyalty and rewards vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Junip. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Junip on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Junip has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Junip” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Junip | Found at Junip, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yotpoyotpo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yotpo | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Voucherifyvoucherify.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Voucherify | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Talon.Onetalon.oneSee also Transparency alternatives to Talon.One | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| TrueLoyaltrueloyal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrueLoyal | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Joyjoy.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Joy | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Okendookendo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Okendo | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| LoyaltyLionloyaltylion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LoyaltyLion | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Stamp Mestampme.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stamp Me | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Bazaarvoicebazaarvoice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bazaarvoice | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Growavegrowave.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Growave | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Marsellomarsello.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Marsello | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Piggypiggy.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Piggy | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.