Alternatives to Reviews.io
Other Loyalty and rewards vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Reviews.io does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Reviews.io on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reviews.io has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Reviews.io does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Reviews.io does not | Reviews.io publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yotpoyotpo.com | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Voucherifyvoucherify.io | 65/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Bazaarvoicebazaarvoice.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Okendookendo.io | 57/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Talon.Onetalon.one | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Zinrelozinrelo.com | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Ferafera.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Growavegrowave.io | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Joyjoy.so | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LoyaltyLionloyaltylion.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Marsellomarsello.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Smile.iosmile.io | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.