SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Epicor Connected Process Control

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Epicor Connected Process Control does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 43 that differ from Epicor Connected Process Control on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Epicor Connected Process Control has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Epicor Connected Process Control does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Epicor Connected Process Control does notEpicor Connected Process Control publishes, and they do not
Tuliptulip.co 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dozukidozuki.com 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Ams Erpams-erp.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net 26/100 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Scytec DataXchangescytec.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Reverreverscore.com 17/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Evoconevocon.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Simussimus-systems.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Abasabas-erp.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Asset Scienceassetscience.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Step Aheadstepahead.de 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.