Alternatives to Itac
Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Itac does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Itac on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Itac has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Itac does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Itac does not | Itac publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worximityworximity.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Ams Erpams-erp.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Evoconevocon.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Abasabas-erp.com | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Step Aheadstepahead.de | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Peakboardpeakboard.com | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Aveva MESaveva.com | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Critical Manufacturingcriticalmanufacturing.com | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Inforinfor.com | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.