SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to RadiantFleet

Other Maritime and port operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RadiantFleet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from RadiantFleet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

RadiantFleet has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and RadiantFleet does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and RadiantFleet does notRadiantFleet publishes, and they do not
Veson Nauticalveson.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ZeroNorthzeronorth.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Awake.AIawake.ai 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Portchainportchain.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Kaleriskaleris.com 30/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Seasea.live 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Vortexavortexa.com 26/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Data location stated Compare
Kplerkpler.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Windwardwindward.ai 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Containerchaincontainerchain.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Danelecdanelec.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Marcuramarcura.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.