SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Toqua

Other Maritime and port operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Toqua does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Toqua on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Toqua has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Toqua does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Toqua does notToqua publishes, and they do not
Veson Nauticalveson.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kaleriskaleris.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Windwardwindward.ai 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Awake.AIawake.ai 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Kplerkpler.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Marcuramarcura.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Shipnextshipnext.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hanseaticsofthanseaticsoft.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Spire Maritimespire.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Danelecdanelec.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Spectecspectec.net 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ABS Wavesightabswavesight.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.