SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Act-On

Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Act-On does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Act-On on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Act-On has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Act-On does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Act-On does notAct-On publishes, and they do not
Insideruseinsider.com 50/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Mappmapp.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Loopsloops.so 75/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Keapkeap.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 1 Data location stated Compare
Customerlycustomerly.io 57/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
CleverTapclevertap.com 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Airshipairship.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
GetResponsegetresponse.com 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Postscriptpostscript.io 56/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
Verogetvero.com 50/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Brazebraze.com 48/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Bloomreachbloomreach.com 35/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.