Transparency alternatives to SendPulse
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SendPulse does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from SendPulse on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SendPulse has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SendPulse does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and SendPulse does not | SendPulse publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetResponsegetresponse.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Keapkeap.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Airshipairship.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Loopsloops.so | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Mappmapp.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Brazebraze.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.io | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Iterableiterable.com | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| MoEngagemoengage.com | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.