Transparency alternatives to Raptor Technologies
Other Mass notification and critical events vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Raptor Technologies does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Raptor Technologies on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Raptor Technologies has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Raptor Technologies does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Raptor Technologies does not | Raptor Technologies publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlertMediaalertmedia.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Singlewiresinglewire.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GroupAlarmgroupalarm.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Zellozello.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Juvarejuvare.com | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| F24f24.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Divera 247divera247.com | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| IamRespondingiamresponding.com | 23/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Active911active911.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Mobile Text Alertsmobile-text-alerts.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Omnilertomnilert.com | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Text-Em-Alltext-em-all.com | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.