Transparency alternatives to Plint
Other Media localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Plint. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Plint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Plint has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Plint” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Plint | Found at Plint, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rask AIrask.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rask AI | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CaptionHubcaptionhub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CaptionHub | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Revrev.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rev | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Happy Scribehappyscribe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Happy Scribe | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Maestramaestra.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Maestra | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sonixsonix.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sonix | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Trinttrint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trint | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Veedveed.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Veed | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| alughaalugha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to alugha | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bunny Studiobunnystudio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bunny Studio | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| EZTitleseztitles.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EZTitles | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kapwingkapwing.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kapwing | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.