SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to MST Global

Other Mining operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that MST Global does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from MST Global on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

MST Global has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and MST Global does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and MST Global does notMST Global publishes, and they do not
Dyno Nobeldynonobel.com 26/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Sandvik Miningsandvik.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
RPMGlobalrpmglobal.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Wencowencomine.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Deswikdeswik.com 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Petra Datapetradatascience.com 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Maptekmaptek.com 18/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Idobaidoba.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Imdeximdexlimited.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Komatsu Smartkomatsu.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Krux Analyticskruxanalytics.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Metsometso.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.