Transparency alternatives to Appknox
Other Mobile application security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Appknox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
5 shown of 5 that differ from Appknox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Appknox has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Appknox does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Appknox does not | Appknox publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guardsquareguardsquare.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| NowSecurenowsecure.com | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ostorlabostorlab.co | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Appdomeappdome.com | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Blue Cedarbluecedar.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.