Alternatives to Chronosphere
Other Monitoring and observability vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Chronosphere does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Chronosphere on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Chronosphere has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Chronosphere does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Chronosphere does not | Chronosphere publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentrysentry.io | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Honeycombhoneycomb.io | 80/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Datadogdatadoghq.com | 74/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| New Relicnewrelic.com | 65/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| UptimeRobotuptimerobot.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Rollbarrollbar.com | 68/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Better Stackbetterstack.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Sumo Logicsumologic.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Grafana Labsgrafana.com | 50/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Netdatanetdata.cloud | 45/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Splunksplunk.com | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Sematextsematext.com | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.