Monitoring and observability vendors, ranked by transparency
Monitoring, logging and observability platforms, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
- 30Vendors
- 28Ranked
- 12Criteria each
- 2026-08-31Checked
| # | Vendor | Score | DPA | Subproc. | Region | Status | Pricing | Certs | SLA | HSTS | Consent | sec.txt | Notice | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sentry | 85 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 2 | Datadog | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 3 | Honeycomb | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 4 | Sumo Logic | 70 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 5 | Rollbar | 68 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 6 | New Relic | 65 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 7 | UptimeRobot | 65 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 8 | Grafana Labs | 50 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 9 | Checkly | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 10 | Coralogix | 45 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 11 | Netdata | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 12 | Better Stack | 40 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 13 | Chronosphere | 40 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 14 | Middleware | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 15 | Logz.io | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 16 | Sematext | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | – | – |
| 17 | Dynatrace | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 18 | Elastic | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 19 | Pingdom | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 20 | Raygun | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 21 | Splunk | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 22 | Site24x7 | 22 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | ✓ | – | – |
| 23 | Bugsnag | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 24 | Highlight | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 25 | SigNoz | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 26 | StatusCake | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 27 | Zabbix | 11 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | – | – | – |
| 28 | Last9 | 10 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| Cronitor | not enough data | – | – | – | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – | |
| Graylog | not enough data | – | – | – | – | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✗ | – | – | – |
This category, criterion by criterion
How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.
Data processing agreement · Subprocessor list · Data location stated · Status page with history · Public pricing · Certifications named · Uptime SLA with a figure · HTTPS enforced with HSTS · No third-party tracking before consent · security.txt (RFC 9116)
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.