SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Greptime

Other Monitoring and observability vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Greptime does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Greptime on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Greptime has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Greptime does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Greptime does notGreptime publishes, and they do not
Sentrysentry.io 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Honeycombhoneycomb.io 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Rollbarrollbar.com 67/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Pulseticpulsetic.com 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Datadogdatadoghq.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
OpenObserveopenobserve.ai 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
New Relicnewrelic.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 nothing Compare
Sumo Logicsumologic.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Better Stackbetterstack.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
UptimeRobotuptimerobot.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
OneUptimeoneuptime.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Coralogixcoralogix.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.