SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Blend

Other Lending and mortgage software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Blend does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Blend on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Blend has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Blend does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Blend does notBlend publishes, and they do not
Drooms Lendingdrooms.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Floifyfloify.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Moxomoxo.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Encompassicemortgagetechnology.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Mambumambu.com 30/100 1 Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Meridianlinkmeridianlink.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Banxwarebanxware.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Fiservfiserv.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Bluevinebluevine.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Lendingpadlendingpad.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Europaceeuropace.de 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Nortridgenortridge.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.