SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Consolidated Independent

Other Music rights and royalties vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Consolidated Independent. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Consolidated Independent on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Consolidated Independent has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Consolidated Independent” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Consolidated IndependentFound at Consolidated Independent, not found there
Reprtoirreprtoir.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reprtoir 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Amuseamuse.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amuse 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Tunecoretunecore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tunecore 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
UnitedMastersunitedmasters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UnitedMasters 26/100 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Chartmetricchartmetric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chartmetric 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Soundchartssoundcharts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soundcharts 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Symphonicsymphonicdistribution.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Symphonic 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Royalty Exchangeroyaltyexchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Royalty Exchange 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Songtrustsongtrust.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Songtrust 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
SourceAudiosourceaudio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SourceAudio 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Jaxstajaxsta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jaxsta 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Pexpex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pex 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.