SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Pangolin

Other Network connectivity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pangolin. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

7 shown of 7 that differ from Pangolin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pangolin has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Pangolin” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PangolinFound at Pangolin, not found there
ngrokngrok.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ngrok 70/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
ZeroTier Centralzerotier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZeroTier Central 39/100 1 Certifications named 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Netmakernetmaker.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Netmaker 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 Compare
localhost.runlocalhost.runSee also Transparency alternatives to localhost.run 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Packetriotpacketriot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Packetriot 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 6 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 Compare
Pinggypinggy.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinggy 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Router Architectsrouterarchitects.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Router Architects 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +4 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.